Tag Archives: Golden record

Three Valuable Ways To Use Your Metadata Manager MDM Tool

You probably know that you can and must validate the integrity of your Data Model using the Metadata Manager Tool workbench (MET), but you can also do much more. In this blog I focus on three additional things you can do with the MET.

Once you have used MET to obtain a valid Data Model, you can continue using MET to:

Migrate your project from development to test, and to production via change lists. (more…)

FacebookTwitterLinkedInEmailPrintShare
Posted in Data Quality, Informatica University, Master Data Management | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

MDM Customer Success Stories @ Informatica World

Are you planning to attend Informatica World 2010 next week?

If so, I invite you to hear these breakout session presentations from our master data management (MDM) customers, including:

  • Johnson & Johnson’s Charles Bloodworth, IT Director, Medical Devices & Diagnostics;
  • Merrill Lynch’s Sal Caruso, Director, Client & Account Data;
  • St. Jude Medical’s Mike Striefel, Senior Manager, Enterprise Information Delivery, and
  • GlaxoSmithKline’s Nipun Bhonsle, Manager, Strategy, Architecture & Information. (more…)
FacebookTwitterLinkedInEmailPrintShare
Posted in Business Impact / Benefits, Business/IT Collaboration, CIO, Customers, Data Governance, Data Quality, Enterprise Data Management, Governance, Risk and Compliance, Informatica Events, Master Data Management, Operational Efficiency, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

MDM – What’s The Cost Of Bad Data In Financial Services?

One of the most critical first steps for financial services firms looking to implement multidomain master data management (MDM) is to quantify the cost savings they could achieve.

Unfortunately, a thorough analysis of potential ROI is also one of the steps least followed (a key culprit being disconnects between business and IT).

This shortcoming is spotlighted in a new Informatica white paper, “Five Steps to Managing Reference Data More Effectively in Investment Banking,” which outlines key questions to ask in sizing up the cost implications of bad data and antiquated systems, such as:

  • How long does it take to introduce a new security to trade?
  • How many settlements need to be fixed manually?
  • How many redundant data feeds does your firm have to manage?
  • How accurate and complete are your end-of-day reports?
  • Do you have the data you need to minimize risk and exposure? (more…)
FacebookTwitterLinkedInEmailPrintShare
Posted in Enterprise Data Management, Financial Services, Governance, Risk and Compliance, Master Data Management, Operational Efficiency | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Answering One Simple Question Shouldn’t Take Six Long Weeks

The CEO of a global technology products manufacturer had a simple question: “I need a list of our top 400 global customers by revenue—immediately.”

The boss got his answer—six weeks later.

That’s how long it took the company’s IT team to root through disparate applications, engage data owners in various business units and geographies, and manually reconcile granular data to answer a basic question that bears directly on the bottom line.

It’s a true story, and one with a happy ending. This multibillion-dollar company implemented Informatica MDM for multidomain master data management (MDM). It exploited the solution’s capabilities and followed best practices in aggressively tackling business-critical data challenges.

Learn about the key business problems solved by MDM as well as best practices  in our white paper, “A GPS for Your MDM Journey”. (more…)

FacebookTwitterLinkedInEmailPrintShare
Posted in Business Impact / Benefits, Customers, Data Quality, Data Warehousing, Master Data Management, Mergers and Acquisitions, Operational Efficiency | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments