Informatica Perspectives

The cover story on the March 8th issue of Computerworld is “Swinging Toward Centralization”. It talks about the pendulum moving toward IT consolidation as organizations strive to save money and improve controls. This article is not alone. A growing number of analysts are talking about consolidation, Lean IT practices, and taking “a production line approach to integration”.  When you combine all this rhetoric with the industry fundamentals, the stage is set for 2010 to The Year of the ICC. [Read more]

Good architecture is the foundation required for agile systems that are responsive to business needs. We see that with SOA, which has been missing a vital piece of its architectural approach – from the data. Since it came about in its current form in the early-to-mid 2000s, service-orientation (mainly focused on applications) has existed in a separate world from data management.

Problem is, an SOA-enabled infrastructure with bad data flowing through it can be useless and even dangerous. One commentator even compared SOA to a mosquito that can deliver payloads of bad data (”viral data”) at lightning speed all across the enterprise — pandemic style — before it can be stopped. [Read more]

Loraine Lawson did a great job covering the topic of the integration challenges around the cloud and virtualization. She reports that “…a recent Internet Evolution column [by David Vellante] looks more broadly at the cloud integration question and concludes that insufficient integration is holding up both cloud computing and virtualization.”

In fact, what currently limits the number of cloud deployments is the lack of a clear understanding of data integration in the context of cloud computing. This is a rather easy problem to solve, but it’s often an afterthought.

The core issue is that cloud computing providers, other than Salesforce.com, don’t consider integration. Perhaps they are thinking, “If you use our cloud, then there is no reason to sync your data back to your enterprise. After all, we’re the final destination for your enterprise data, right?” Wrong. [Read more]

While the market is showing signs of recovery from the "Great Recession" most state budgets have been feeling the squeeze from the lag in recovery. In a recent article titled The Sorry State of Finances, Liam Denning explained that, "55% of state revenue, before federal transfers, comes from personal and corporate income tax." Denning also stated that, "the first three quarters of 2009 were the worst for state tax since at least 1963."

There is an apparent lag between recovery in the private sector and a state receiving tax revenue. So what can states do about this problem while they suffer in the red? Mr. Denning said, "Since states can't run general funding deficits, closing gaps mean raising taxes, cutting services and resorting to one-time measures." Mr. Denning's list of solutions is certainly accurate, but does it include all options that states have? What about employing new technology to discover fraud or recover uncollected revenue? [Read more]

This week, I attended a CIO conference in Philadelphia, for the first time in a couple of years. It was really good to hear them talk about their experiences, goals and issues, and to talk with some of them one on one. It spurred a bunch of new thoughts, which I’ll be writing about in a series of upcoming blogs. This first posting is on CIOs playing offense.

In my last posting, I talked about the Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde nature of data—data being both an asset and a liability. The CIOs talked about playing offense vs. defense. They really wanted to be engaged with business transformation and growth initiatives. But many were saddled with cumbersome, expensive IT environments that sucked up 90% of their IT spend and resources just to “keep the lights on”. In other words, they were spending almost all their time and energy playing defense. [Read more]

This is the last of the Data as an Asset series and what better way to wrap up the theme than with a view to the future. As stated by Thomas Redman, author of Data Driven, “Your company's data is a key business asset, and you need to manage it aggressively and professionally.” The future vision then is around Agile Data-Driven Enterprises. [Read more]

Two of the more common questions that arise when trying to effectively deploy Data Governance are; "Where do I begin?" and "What business areas should I include?".  If you start too narrowly, the value and credibility of the effort is questioned.   Be too aggressive, and delivery risk and scalability become a problem.  As usual, success comes down to defining and managing scope.   However, more times than not it is prudent to err on the small side, and here's why… [Read more]

2009 was a banner year for Informatica's OEM business. We grew the number of ISVs (Software Companies), BPOs (Business Process Outsourcers) and SaaS/Cloud providers who use the Informatica platform as part of/with their offerings by 24 new partners. What was really interesting throughout 2009 was the variety of use cases across the spectrum of new partners addressed by various platform capabilities. You can read about this breadth and more details on specific examples in "2009 OEM Momentum".

For software, application or service providers faced with data acquisition, data conversion, data quality, data exchange, or other related challenges in the cloud or on premise, using the Informatica platform can alleviate that pain and allow them to focus on their core business.

With the delivery of Informatica 9 and the acquisition of Siperian, I expect that variety and growth to continue in 2010!

Continuing with the Data as Asset series, in this posting I explore the negative side and what can happen when data becomes a liability. Physical assets such as buildings, equipment, or even money, can become a liability if not managed properly; buildings can become unsafe to work in, machinery can be dangerous to operate, and business investments can turn into money-sinks. Similarly, data and information systems can also be assets that provide economic value to the enterprise or they can be liabilities that destroy value or put the business at risk if not managed well. Here are three common scenarios. [Read more]

Business modernization programs typically focus on process standardization to gain the benefits of efficient repeatable, measurable processes. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) technologies fulfill the process standardization requirements and have now become a central point for management of business processes. However, ERP systems do not prevent low quality data from entering the systems nor do they measure its impact on the efficiency of a business process. Most organizations today are using the same ERP systems (SAP or Oracle) that were configured by the same consultancies. Therefore, the uniqueness and the scope for competitive advantage of any organization are defined by the people and the data. [Read more]