Five Things to Look for When Hiring an Enterprise Architect (Part 2)
Posted in Business Impact / Benefits, Data Integration, Data Warehousing by Joe McKendrick |![]() |
What does it take to make a good enterprise architect?
In my previous post, I mentioned the five top qualities that are essential for enterprise architects. These individuals are the critical bridge between business and IT, and can help ensure the success of important initiatives such as data warehousing, business intelligence, and service oriented architecture.
1 - As noted previously, to be able to conceptualize and promote data management initiatives, the EA needs to be well-respected and influential. This is the first quality to look for.
2- The EA needs to be well versed in and able to emphasize methodology, modeling, and governance. Ron Schmelzer, partner with ZapThink, says individuals from the development side may be pressed into EA roles, but may not be qualified. "Sure, there might be many 'paper architects' - that is, those that claim EA and/or SOA skills on their resumes or in their career history, but much of that experience will be attendance at a few vendor-heavy SOA courses, the development of Web services-centric interfaces, and a sore lack of any methodology, modeling, service lifecycle, or governance experience to speak of," he pointed out.
"Yes, it might just be that the biggest force gating widespread adoption of SOA is not the technical complexity of SOA projects (one can actually say that the technology part is relatively trivial), but rather the organizational, architectural, and skill gap that most companies have in making this architectural change a reality." EAs bring together these skills.
3- Great EAs need to be technologically and politically "neutral." Gartner's Scott Bittler has more to say on this important quality. "Unfortunately, many strong technical people are also quite biased in their views toward vendors/products and tend to 'go with what they know,'" he explains. "Architects must be vendor/product-neutral and maintain an objective perspective. Likewise, it is important to understand enough about the broad range of technologies that an architect can engage in discussion with technical experts and not be swayed by inappropriately biased personal agendas in technical decisions."
4 - High-performing EAs also should be articulate, persuasive, and good salespeople. "Enterprise architects must spend substantial time communicating and educating," says Bittler. "Therefore, it is important that they have the skills to clearly communicate ideas in a persuasive, compelling manner… Effective enterprise architects have the rare ability to zoom out and be able to conduct a worthwhile discussion about business strategy with the CEO and, a minute later, be in a technical expert's office with a zoomed-in mindset discussing technical details without getting lost."
5 - Finally, EAs need to have enthusiastic qualities. EAs should have a passion for life, work, and EA, Bittler says. "Far too many architects are rendered much less effective simply due to a lack of enthusiasm in their communication about EA," he says.
At a time where the ability to leverage information and data means competitive advantage, every business needs an extraordinary pool of knowledge talent that not only understands the power of technology, but also how it can be applied to business growth. Enterprise architects fill this role quite effectively.













3 Comments, Comment or Ping
Dylan Jones
Nice article Joe, an interesting read.
I think your point about being a salesperson is a very valid one.
I've witnessed many EA's who really lack some of the key skills of salesmanship, technically brilliant and able to rattle off scores of features but often fail to articulate those as benefits that the business will receive, and at various corporate levels (like your zoom-in/zoom-out analogy).
I would also add an element of change management in there.
In particular, I think some EA's struggle with creating a sense of urgency, I think this ties in to point 5 somewhat.
EA's need to understand the different change management activities to help them "sell" the business to the next stage and identify where blockading is taking place, it's not enough to dream up a vision and plan then pass it down the line, I believe they have to become the force that will drive it through, with sponsorship support of course.
Nov 29th, 2008
Dylan Jones
…I would also add that in reviewing these traits, they seem uncannily applicable to "Head of DQ" type roles.
Looking at the recent heads of data quality we've been interviewing on Data Quality Pro.com they all possessed similar characteristics to what you cite above.
They were all politically sensitive, great at influencing the organisation, technology minded but agnostic where required, enthusiastic and passionate about the subject, great sales people and extremely articulate.
I think the underlying theme with these type of people who rise to the top is that technical wizardry is useless if you can't get the business to drop their silo mentality and work together in one direction.
Dec 1st, 2008
Joe McKendrick
Thanks for the feedback, Dylan. You make an interesting point about the parallels between EA and DQ qualifications. I often find many parallels between requirements for data governance/management and other initiatives, such as SOA. In discussions with academic program leaders in recent years, I am finding that there has been great demand for graduates of technical programs (such as MIS) that also are well-rounded with business skills as well.
Information technology is at the point where it pervades all levels of business — and no key business decisions are made without consideration of technology requirements. That's why IT departments need to be able to step up to the plate and articulate how technology can address business requirements.
-Joe
Dec 5th, 2008
Reply to “Five Things to Look for When Hiring an Enterprise Architect (Part 2)”