Richard Trapp

Richard Trapp
Richard Trapp is a Managing Partner and Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Northfield Consulting Group, a provider of strategic data quality consulting services. Mr. Trapp is a highly accomplished Data Quality practitioner and proven business leader with more than 19 years experience in Data Quality, business development and business optimization. Prior to Northfield Consulting Group, he was the director of global data quality for a Fortune 500 provider of business communications solutions and services. During this tenure, he designed and implemented an Enterprise Data Quality Program including organizational design and governance, operating framework and detailed process designs for full suite Data Quality service offerings. He has successfully planned and led numerous Data Quality strategies and initiatives with dozens of core team members and hundreds of extended team members, totaling nearly 500 thousand Data Quality service hours. Recognized as a leading practitioner and thought leader, Richard regularly presents at industry events on the business benefits of Data Quality. He leverages his unique business perspective and Data Quality operations experience to develop and deliver complex, value-driven solutions. Richard is a charter member of the International Association for Information and Data Quality (IAIDQ) and was a member of the team that authored the Information Quality Certified Professional (IQCP) certification examination. He has received a certificate from MIT in “Principles and Foundations of Information Quality”.

Non-Traditional Challenges To Achieving Data Quality (Part 2)

In my first posting, I introduced the concept of “non-traditional” challenges to achieving data quality success.  I have classified these eight challenges into four distinct Data Quality Gap areas: Expectations, Positioning, Perception and Delivery. I will explore the Expectations Gap in this posting.

The Data Quality Expectations Gap

As with any product, service or solution, it starts with understanding our “customers” and what motivates them. We then have to match our message to their expectations. This seems pretty straight forward, right? However, that brings us to the first non-traditional challenge……customers are not excited about data quality. In fact, I have yet to speak with a customer or business person who was even looking for data quality. Yet, very often that is what data quality professionals are proposing or selling. As a result, there is a mismatch between message and motivator. (more…)

FacebookTwitterLinkedInEmailPrintShare
Posted in Data Integration | Leave a comment

Non-Traditional Challenges To Achieving Data Quality

As another year comes to an end it seems like we are confronted with many of the same barriers that we faced years ago when it comes to positioning and achieving the “promise” of data quality.  So why has data quality been slow in gaining traction as a valued and integral part of the business operating model?  As data quality professionals, what can we do to overcome this inertia and advance the data quality culture?

Before we can attempt to answer these questions, we need to be able to recognize the challenges that are impeding our progress.  If you ask any data quality professional to identify the key data quality challenges that they face, the list will invariably include: lack of sponsorship, unclear ownership, environment complexity, high volumes, limited documentation, prohibitive cost, insufficient skills, inadequate tools, etc.  These are the “traditional” challenges that most everyone cites and they are certainly real.

However, in my experience over the last several years I have identified eight “non-traditional” challenges that I believe present an even greater barrier to data quality success.  My next four postings will discuss these challenges and some techniques for overcoming them.  Stay tuned.

Richard Trapp is the founder and Managing Partner of J Baron Group, LLC


FacebookTwitterLinkedInEmailPrintShare
Posted in Business Impact / Benefits, Data Integration, Data Quality | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment