Rome Wasn’t Built in a Day and Neither is a Data Governance Initiative
Posted by Chris Cingrani in: Data Quality > Governance / Stewardship
![]() |
Continue reading "Rome Wasn’t Built in a Day and Neither is a Data Governance Initiative" »
Posted by Chris Cingrani in: Data Quality > Governance / Stewardship
![]() |
Continue reading "Rome Wasn’t Built in a Day and Neither is a Data Governance Initiative" »
Posted by Neil Gow in: Data Quality > Best Practices ; Data Quality ; Data Quality > Governance / Stewardship ; Data Quality > Management
Alice: Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?
The Cheshire Cat: That depends a good deal on where you want to get to
Alice: I don't much care where.
The Cheshire Cat: Then it doesn't much matter which way you go
– Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland
![]() |
When confronted with the problem of how to address their data quality issues many organisations are faced with a similar dilemma to that which confronted Alice during her travels in Wonderland; “I know that I need to do something, but I don’t know where to start”. Knowing where to start and, equally importantly, the size of the problem as well as where an organisation needs to go are critical factors in ensuring that their data quality journey takes them where they need to be at the price they are prepared to pay.
When planning their “journey” organisations need to address the issue of data quality holistically by considering each of the three DQ pillars in turn; firstly “People”, then “Ideas” and finally “Technology”. Many DQ initiatives have failed as the primary focus has been on delivering a technical solution. However without the right framework in place and operated by the right people this approach will never deliver the results that organisations need. Time and time again within the IT industry it has been proved that the pure application of technology will never solve business issues, as technology in itself will never win the “war”, it is always the right people with the right ideas who use the technology in the right way.
Posted by Garry Moroney in: Data Quality > Best Practices ; Data Quality ; Data Quality > Governance / Stewardship ; Data Quality > Management
I’ve just been reading a US Department of Education briefing document on improving data quality in education performance data. The report stresses the impact that low quality data can have on measuring the success of education programs. It discusses for example the numerous data quality problems identified in the “No child left behind” program established in 2001. The problems are typical – non-standardized data definitions, inconsistent data from different sources, data entry errors, lack of timeliness.
The briefing document outlines a broad set of data quality guidelines to be implemented right across the education system in the US – at State level, in Local Education Agencies (LEAs) and in schools themselves. The three foundation stones of the data quality framework outlined are:
• suitable technical infrastructure,
• a comprehensive dictionary of data definitions
• staff ownership, organization and training
Posted by Larry English in: Data Quality ; Data Quality > Governance / Stewardship ; Data Quality > Management ; Data Quality > Technology
![]() |
But Mr. Skilling will have a new job as well. He will probably work as a food service helper, painter or plumber. While this is not the cush job he had as CEO at Enron where he earned $151.7 million over the three years during the time he perpetuated his fraud, he will get from 14 to 40 cents per hour. At the top pay, Skilling could earn $832 per year. At that rate it would take 74.5 million years to pay back the stock and pension losses he foisted on the stakeholders.
So what is the point here?
| © 2006 Informatica Corporation, The Data Integration Company. All rights reserved | Contact Us | Terms of Use | RSS |